The Cold War kept more than the nations of Europe apart. The lack of communication and trade between the Western and Eastern parts of the continent also inihibited the exchange of non-indigenous species of birds, a recent study suggests.
The research found that during an extended period following World War II, when most trade and travel was interrupted between Eastern Europe and its western counterparts, there were far fewer introduced bird species, says a statement released today by Oregon State University.
Western Europe and Eastern Europe were divided along these boundaries during the Cold War, and more trade was internal, as indicated by the arrows, instead of between the two blocs.
The unusual isolation of Eastern Europe for more than four decades provided a unique opportunity to study the effect of socio-economic and political factors on invasive species, the researchers said. “In that context, eastern European ecosystems actually benefited from the isolation and also provide insight into how invasive species problems can be reduced with more aggressive regulation and monitoring.”
Graphic courtesy of Oregon State University
The study, published recently in the journal Biological Conservation, found that prior to the Cold War, Western Europe had 36 non-European introduced species and Eastern Europe had 11. By the time that period of international tension and restricted trade ended, Western Europe had experienced an increase to 54 non-European introduced bird species, but Eastern Europe had actually declined from 11 to five.
“The isolation of the Eastern European bloc from the west during the Cold War led to a decline in the number of birds introduced, the number of introduction events and the number of bird species established,” the study authors wrote in their report.
In light of that, the researchers suggest that clear policies need to be established to prevent further inflow of exotic species into previously isolated regions, and warn that the problems illustrated by this phenomenon in Europe may play out in similar ways all over the world as trade expands.
“Global trade is a real concern for invasive species, and the lessons we can learn from the Cold War offer a warning flag to developing countries that are now expanding in an international economy,” said Susan Shirley, a research associate in the College of Forestry at Oregon State University.
The problem, Shirley said, is that there’s often a correlation between politics, trade and ecosystem function.
Control or eradication of invading species is extremely difficult and expensive, Shirley said, and prevention of animal importation is the only sure approach to address this problem. “It relates not just to birds, which were the focus of this research, but to forest pests, fisheries, non-native crustaceans and many other species.”
Even though birds, in theory, need pay little attention to international borders, in fact they tend to stay in native habitats. However, they sometimes establish populations in new locales if they are brought there, Shirley said.
This alien, destructive parakeet is currently expanding its range across Western Europe. It can be a serious agricultural pest and competes with native birds for nesting cavities, according to the researchers..
Photo courtesy of Oregon State University
“Traditionally we don’t hear much about birds as an invasive species, but they can be,” Shirley said.
“The common myna, a subtropical bird, is a generalist predator and a crop pest, and has been included on a list of the 100 worst invasive species,” Shirley said. “The collard dove is a habitat generalist and has now spread all over Europe. And of even more concern, there are several species with serious impacts in other regions of the world that may be in the process of establishing populations in Europe, largely due to the escape of wild-caught pet birds.”