National Geographic

VOICES Voices Icon Ideas and Insight From Explorers

Menu

Monarch Butterflies: Miles to Go Before They Sleep (and Lay Eggs)

Dr. Stephen B. Malcolm, professor at Western Michigan University, has been studying monarch butterflies in the field for 28 years, recently with support from National Geographic’s Committee for Research and Exploration. He can tell you all about the monarchs passing through your garden this spring — and some of their mysterious cousins in South America.

Q: Monarchs are floating through neighborhoods across the United States this spring. Where are they coming from and where are they going?

Almost every monarch butterfly east of the Rocky Mountains spends the winter near the tops of forest-clad mountains in central Mexico, about 100 kilometers west of Mexico City.  Now that we’ve just passed the spring equinox, the tight aggregations of butterflies are breaking up and the monarchs are flying north to the abundant milkweeds across the southern United States, from Texas to Florida. These butterflies are looking for patches of milkweeds, where mated females will lay their eggs and most of them will die, leaving their offspring to continue to find and use milkweeds distributed all the way to southern Canada.

Photo by Lincoln Brower, Sweet Briar College
Photo by Stephen B. Malcolm

Top Photo: Basking male and female Danaus plexippus — the northern monarch species — in Michoachan, Mexico. The northern and southern species appear almost identical, except that the trailing edge of the northern type’s forewing is black, while in the southern species it’s orange. Northern monarchs are migrating from Mexico to the northern United States and Canada this spring.

Bottom photo: A male Danaus erippus (southern monarch) feeds on nectar near Tucuman, Argentina. Do these southern monarchs migrate?

Q: What kinds of hurdles do these migrating insects face throughout their range, and are they struggling as a species?

Monarchs do not appear to be struggling as a species because they have a worldwide distribution, but they are confronted by a series of hurdles throughout their life histories. These include both legal and illegal forestry activities in Mexico at the overwintering locations and intensive agriculture in the U.S., Canada and northern Mexico, where monarchs are impacted by both genetically modified crops and the use of insecticides and herbicides.

We also think that the butterflies are being impacted by global climate change both through shifts in available carbon dioxide that change milkweed chemical defenses and changes in temperature regimes that lead to depletion of adult butterfly fat reserves. Increasing urbanization of North America as human populations increase also leads to disappearance of critically important milkweed habitat and milkweed host plant diversity.

Q: What can the average person do to provide support to the monarchs that cross their path?

The most popular measures include “butterfly gardening” — planting attractive milkweed host plants for larvae and flowering nectar resources that help adults store the fat they need for migration and overwintering. But it is important to plant milkweed and nectar plants that occur in your neighborhood rather than species that you can buy online or might have collected elsewhere.

Different milkweeds and nectar plants influence the success of monarchs, and we think that they are responsible for the extraordinary migratory life history of monarchs.  For example, in the northern U.S., it makes most sense to grow the common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca, which has a delightful scent and very showy flowers. They can be quite invasive, but in a dedicated butterfly garden with barriers to stop the underground spread of the unusual stems of this species, the plant can be controlled.

Other attractive species include butterfly weed, Asclepias tuberosa, and swamp milkweed, Asclepias incarnata, but these two species have regional forms, and it may be important to use local seed.

In the southern U.S., perhaps the best species is the green milkweed, Asclepias viridis. The most easily grown milkweed species is Asclepias curassavica, also known as blood flower for its showy red and yellow flowers, but this species is really from South America, and I don’t think it should be used intentionally to feed wild monarch larvae in North America.

Photo by Stephen B. Malcolm

Photo: Larva of Danaus erippus — the southern monarch — with Danaus gilippus, a relative of the monarch, feeding on a common milkweed plant near Campinas, Brazil.

Q: Your research especially focuses on the southern monarch found in South America, the little-known sister species of the northern variety. When was this species discovered and how?

The southern monarch butterfly was named Danaus erippus by Cramer in 1775, but until 2007 it was thought to be a subspecies of the northern monarch, Danaus plexippus, because the two butterflies are startlingly similar in appearance, the only difference apparently being that the trailing edge of the forewing of plexippus is black, but in erippus it is orange.

However, in 2007 the two species were shown to be distinct, although they are extremely closely related. So because the two species are very brightly colored and common, they have been known since Linnaeus started to catalog species diversity in Sweden in the 18th century. However, unlike plexippus, which has received a large amount of attention from researchers, almost nothing is known about erippus in South America.

Q: The southern monarch has a puzzling migration pattern, correct?

We know a great deal about migration in plexippus and overwintering in both Mexico and along the coast of California and the seasonal movements of this handsome butterfly. However, for erippus in South America, we only know from a series of anecdotal papers by Hayward that the butterfly shows seasonal movements in Argentina.

In North America, monarchs exploit approximately 120 species of Asclepias milkweeds as larval host plants, but in South America monarchs only have access to six or perhaps eight species of Asclepias. The butterflies also fly south in the autumn along the eastern edge of the Andes Mountains in Argentina, a very puzzling phenomenon that takes them to colder latitudes for the winter.

Last April we spent two weeks watching 40,000 to 50,000 monarchs a day flying south along the foothills of the Andes, just west of Tucumán in north western Argentina. So far, we haven’t a clue about where they are going for the winter, although we have seen them clustering and nectaring like northern monarchs in the valleys of the eastern Andes near Tucumán. In Bolivia we think that the monarchs may show an altitudinal migration that may perhaps also result in some butterflies migrating south into Argentina for the winter.

Photo by Stephen B. Malcolm

Photo by Stephen B. Malcolm

Photos: A male Danaus erippus (southern monarch) and a female (lower photo) warm up before setting out to find nectar sources near Tucuman, Argentina. The female southern monarch’s wing color is darker than that of the male.

Q: Unlike the northern monarch, the southern monarch has a very low diversity of available host plants. What is the comparison of the two species’ life histories showing about the role of plant diversity and dispersion in the evolution of migration?

As indicated above, northern monarchs have a very wide choice of available milkweed species, and we think that the northern, common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca, is very important to monarch breeding and migration success. We also think that southern milkweed species are important for the effective defense of the butterflies and their larvae against predators such as birds, mice, wasps, ants and perhaps parasites because the butterfly larvae eat and store toxic chemicals called cardenolides that they use to poison natural enemies. This is perhaps the main reason why monarch butterflies are so brightly colored — by advertising their toxicity they are largely left alone by enemies.

In our research in South America, we are hypothesizing that these factors are also important. For example, we have found the southern monarch exploiting a very toxic, high-altitude milkweed called Asclepias barjoniifolia, at 4,000 meters altitude. It would be exciting if the distribution of this plant species encourages altitudinal migration in southern monarchs because butterflies that feed on this plant are especially toxic to predators.

Photo by Barbara Cockrell

Photo: Professor Stephen B. Malcolm of Western Michigan University near Sucre, Bolivia, with a favorite plant of the southern monarch butterfly. Malcolm is on the trail of the southern monarch, only recently identified as a separate species from the northern, closely related sister species known in the United States.

Comments

  1. Tony G
    Minneapolis
    January 16, 2013, 5:59 pm

    I have to agree with Paul’s posts about Asclepias curassavica. I keep hearing about its potential threat, yet I’ve never heard any compelling evidence to back up these theories.

    Monarchs are facing challenges in Mexico from illegal logging reducing their available wintering grounds. Their population is also being decimated from man-made insecticides. I doubt a milkweed plant that has been shown to have medicinal qualities in fighting OE has a serious role in the declining monarch population.

    As a butterfly garden enthusiast, I plant several species of milkweed in my garden (both native and non-native) and the monarchs use ALL of them. I’ve never understood why it always has to be one or the other.

    Also keep in mind, that there are many gardeners that don’t want invasive native milkweeds in their garden, but would be happy to add a more garden-friendly variety like tropical. In those cases, it’s either some milkweed or NO milkweed.

    If a plant isn’t causing harm to a new region, the “don’t plant it because it wan’t there before” argument is completely lost on me.

    If the climate is truly changing, won’t we be forced to introduce non-natives to adapt?

    With habitat loss and pesticide looming over the monarchs’ future, focusing on tropical milkweed as ” the enemy” seems like a waste of time in my opinion. Respectfully, Tony

  2. Can Milkweed be Bad for Monarchs
    January 12, 2013, 8:01 am

    [...] other part of the problem with Tropical Milkweed is that these confused non-migratory groups are more susceptible to parasites, which can be passed [...]

  3. Jasmine
    pzpeIxmfTkRRgQXVxe
    September 23, 2012, 4:23 am

    Dear classI read your book about the monarch buerttfly. I am amazed by all that you have learned. Fantastic work, I am going to share it with my class, they are Year 6 to 8. I think they will be very impressed.I live in New Zealand, we have the Monarch buerttfly here too, and some develop on a plant in our school grounds. The plant is called the Swan plant, because it has seed pods shaped a little like a swan. We have a problem here, because a wasp that was introduced into our country, preys on the caterpillar and so Monarchs are endangered by it. My next door neighbours have like a monarch nursery where they watch and care for them, and try to keep the wasps from getting them.I learned many interesting facts from your ebook, thank you. Miss TraskNew ZealandPS I love the iPad, and I can see from your work you do too.

  4. Nancy Seaberg
    Dallas, TX
    May 29, 2012, 2:39 pm

    Which milkweed would be most helpful to grow in Texas? And where can it be purchased. The nurseries act like they are helpful and are to some degree. After months of asking, they have finally got some in and are sold out in hours. Your suggestions would be welcomed. I will share your information with others. I am an avid gardener, who is doing my best to support the environment, birds, butterflies, bees, etc.

  5. jugendbett
    jugendbett
    February 15, 2012, 1:22 am

    That’s an all ’round great piece!

  6. میزبانی وب
    میزبانی وب
    November 14, 2011, 3:08 pm

    This surely makes perfect sense to anyone..

  7. Jessie B
    Los Angeles, CA
    July 31, 2011, 1:48 pm

    Hope this helps in your research. We just spent 2 weeks driving in northern Argentina and ran across what appeared to be a migration of the Southern Monarch. We can across a small mountain pass on route 9 exactly at the border between Salta & Jujuy province. There was a sign welcoming you to Jujuy & a turn off there, the Monarchs where coming up from Salta province and headed north into Jujuy province. They seemed to be crossing the mountain at this exact spot which was the lowest point between two peaks and dropping into the next valley. In about 15 minutes of watching them there was probably about a thousand of them.

    Hope the info helps!
    Jessie

  8. Paul Cherubini
    El Dorado, Calif.
    May 11, 2011, 9:43 pm

    Disrupt what interactions, Steve? Disrupt the migratory physiology of the butterflies? How is it conceivable that planting currassavica and fruticosa milkweeds in the USA could somehow disrupt migratory physiology given the fact that the monarch migration and overwintering phenonemon in the temperate latitude regions of Australia, New Zealand and Spain wouldn’t even exist unless humans had planted these non-native tropical milkweeds?

    Also, the diversity and abundance of native Asclepias milkweeds in North America have already been greatly and irreversibly altered by human activities during the past 150 years (e.g. 88% of the monarchs overwintering in Mexico fed on syriaca as larvae – a species that thrives on disturbed soil and became very widespread and abundant only during the past 150 years due to forest clearing, road building and agriculture.

  9. [...] LINK: NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC INTERVIEW [...]

  10. Steve Malcolm
    Kalamazoo, Michigan
    April 13, 2011, 11:51 am

    Paul, thanks also for commenting. I agree completely that monarchs exist across the Pacific to New Zealand and Australia and in Spain because milkweeds were planted by humans – especially Asclepias curassavica and Gomphocarpus (Asclepias) fruticosus. However, I don’t really see how you can disagree with the origins of Asclepias curassavica in South and Central America. This milkweed is very common throughout most of South America and is an important natural hostplant of the southern monarch, Danaus erippus. Unlike South America with only 12 species of Asclepias (including curassavica), North America is a center of diversity for the genus Asclepias with about 120 species, and as such, Mexico the USA and Canada provide wonderful opportunities to understand the reasons for migration in this extraordinary butterfly and their use of the different native milkweeds. Why would we want to disrupt these interactions with Asclepias curassavica just because it is easy to grow?

  11. Steve Malcolm
    Kalamazoo, Michigan
    April 13, 2011, 11:41 am

    Van, Thanks very much for commenting. I expect you know about efforts to grow A. syriaca commercially in Nebraska and Iowa. Since the plant is so modular it could be a good source of high quality fibre and perhaps other commercially valuable products. There are some wonderful citizen science projects in the US and Canada on monarchs that examine host plant use, migration and disease incidence in monarchs.

  12. Paul Cherubini
    El Dorado, Calif.
    April 7, 2011, 12:02 pm

    The monarch migrations in Australia, New Zealand, Spain and Portugal wouldn’t exist unless man had introduced non-native milkweeds to those countries.

    Therefore I profoundly disagree with Dr. Malcolm’s position that: “Asclepias curassavica, is really from South America, and I don’t think it should be used intentionally to feed wild monarch larvae in North America.”

  13. Van Burnette
    Black Mountain, NC
    April 6, 2011, 9:14 pm

    I am currently involved with growing A. syriaca to see if it can be reproduced commercially. I am also very much involved with the monarch butterfly. Is there anything that I can contribute to any research?
    Thanks