National Geographic

VOICES Voices Icon Ideas and Insight From Explorers

Menu

A Plea for the Water in All We Use, Make and Eat

“We’re using tomorrow’s water to meet today’s food demand,” warned Sandra Postel, National Geographic Freshwater Fellow, helping to provoke a meaningful discussion on water as it relates to food at the Aspen Environmental Forum. Agriculture was a central theme as it consumes a disproportionate share of global water resources.

Jon Foley from the University of Minnesota painted a picture of our inefficiency. “One liter of water is needed to irrigate one calorie food, but that changes by factor of 100 for the most inefficient practices.” It is clear that water efficiency improvements for agriculture must play a large role.

One challenge is to gain an accurate understanding of the issue because allocation of water resources is not easily visible. Postel explained the concept of “virtual water” to paint a clearer picture.

Water is a direct and indirect component of everything we use, make and eat. The average American consumes 2,000 gallons of water per day and more than half is incorporated into our diet. Grain represents the trading currency for water in the same way that oil is a trading currency for energy. The reason Egypt imports grain is because they are water stressed.

The first thing a water stressed country will do is to shift their water resources from the agriculture sector to the urban and industrial sector in order to maximize the economic potential of available water. As China and India face water problems, Postel said to expect a major shift in grain trade.

On a similar note, Foley advised not to get distracted by the real problem. Only one bottle of water is needed to produce a bottle of water, whereas hundreds of gallons of water goes into a thimble size cup of cream due to the agricultural origin of the product. Bottled water is not a water problem. It is a plastic problem. It is important to recognize the true nature of the problem.

The session finished with some advice from Postel. Don’t just think about production side of things. Instead frame the question, “How do we provide a nutritious diet on less water?”

Comments

  1. Marianne
    Australia
    November 29, 1:03 am

    such an old topic. traditional agriculture is wasteful in all manor be it water, soil degradation and environment destabilisation. Their are other forms of growing food including aquaponics that uses a 10% the water traditional farming uses and produces multiple crops, be it fish, crayfish, shrimp, or water protein source and almost any plant crop all organic and beneficial to each other.

  2. Hailey Martin
    Oregon
    October 21, 5:53 pm

    ;(

  3. Madi
    Denver, Colorado
    April 5, 3:00 pm

    While agriculture poses a larger threat to water than bottled water does I would say that bottled water is still a water issue. Bottled water supports the privatization of water, along with creating a pollution problem, which affects our waterways.

  4. Richa
    Chandigarh
    February 20, 4:35 am

    We’re using tomorrow’s water to meet today’s food demand

  5. micro jobs
    http://www.sleekservice.com
    June 9, 2013, 11:59 am

    This short article is simple to adhere to and yet it truly strikes a chord. It tends to make you stop and consider the viewpoints. You have carried out extremely well.

  6. Chad Lipton
    June 6, 2011, 12:11 pm

    Cream requires water for raising and grazing cattle, and bottling and processing. The National Geographic website does a good job in illustrating the embedded costs of water: http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/freshwater/embedded-water/

    This site explains that 55 gallons of water go into production of one cup of milk. Maybe Foley was exaggerating by estimating in the 100s of gallons. On the other hand, I’m not sure if cream is more water intensive than milk. It’s possible.

  7. Donna Thomas
    Oregon
    June 4, 2011, 2:45 pm

    This is scary! Doesn’t seem possible that that it would take 100s of gallons of water to produce one thimble of cream!! That’s insane, how is this calculated? If that’s true, there has to be a better way. What really is mind boggling is that there are probably an exponential amount of similar examples all over the world. The problem, too many people don’t look for the most efficient way to do things or they don’t care. I know people who still don’t recycle, i just don’t understand it!!!! Sorry for writing a book, this is a subject that i am passionate about! If everyone on the planet would just do little more to conserve water, energy, and recycle what they can, the results would be dramatic.