National Geographic

VOICES Voices Icon Ideas and Insight From Explorers

Menu

The Great (Dwindling) Barrier Reef Loses Half Its Coral Cover In Under 30 Years

The following piece was originally published at ClimateProgress.org.

If half the Grand Canyon crumbled to nothing in less than three decades, would we stand up and pay attention? If Teddy and Abe’s heads eroded off Mount Rushmore would we step in to save George and Tom?

Sadly, that’s what is happening to one of the world’s great natural treasures.

A new study released yesterday by the Australian Institute of Marine Science shows that in just the last 27 years, the Great Barrier Reef has lost half of its coral.

Coral reef degradation is unfortunately not a new phenomenon. A 2011 report from the World Resources Institute found that three-quarters of the world’s coral reefs are threatened by increased stress from pollution and climate change. Corals are very sensitive to temperature, but because they are stationary, they cannot migrate to find their prime habitat. So as ocean temperatures warm, the coral organisms die, leaving just the white skeletal structures, a phenomenon known as bleaching.

Yet according to this new study, this degradation is less directly linked to the usual suspects. Just 10 percent of the loss was attributable to bleaching. The study found coastal storms were the leading culprit that caused 48 percent of the damage, and the remaining 42 percent was a result of an exploding population of the crown of thorns starfish that preys on coral.

Don’t mistake these causes for reason to think climate change isn’t responsible. After all, an increase in intensity of coastal storms is undoubtedly a symptom of planetary warming.

Controlling the starfish problem, it turns out, would allow the reef’s degradation — pegged at losses of between four and eight percent of coral cover per year — to reverse. Even at current levels of temperature and acidity, we could see slow coral growth. The starfish problem may be slightly easier to manage than reversing global emissions of greenhouse gasses, but it will require action sure to be unpopular with agricultural interests. As CNN reports:

According to the study, the starfish in its larval stage feeds on plankton, populations of which surge when fertilizer runoff floods the coastal ocean waters with nutrients. So plentiful plankton can lead to swarms of hungry starfish.

The last time the starfish bloomed in 2003, the government spent more than $3 million to try to control the population. No easy feat. But the motivation to succeed may be as great as the Great Barrier Reef itself. In addition to the inherent value of protecting a tremendous natural resource, and the environmental benefits it provides from fish habitat to protection against storm surges, the reef is also a major economic engine in northeast Australia. According to Nick Heath, a spokesman for the World Wildlife Fund Australia, “Sixty thousand jobs in the tourism industry depend on us acting with urgency over the next few years.”

Oddly, the Australian government is also planning coal and natural gas export facilities that would bring a constant stream of ships across the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area.

With all these environmental threats and new industrial activity, apparently we’ll have to be content with renaming one of our most spectacular natural wonders the Incredibly Shrinking Barrier Reef.

Michael Conathan is the Director of Ocean Policy at the Center for American Progress

Comments

  1. Jai
    NSW
    November 5, 2013, 8:12 pm

    I feel sorry for the great barrier reef :( :( :( :(

  2. Chris Coverdale
    UK
    November 29, 2012, 12:08 pm

    Get rid of fuel run cars and run them on the latest liquid air engines now been designed.

  3. Achsah
    Trivandrum
    November 14, 2012, 7:05 am

    So sad, I am crying here…. OMG…

  4. vitor
    beja
    October 7, 2012, 8:55 am

    o ser humano gasta milhões em planetas sem vida e deixa morrer o planeta terra,não tem lógica…

  5. Sam
    Bangkok
    October 7, 2012, 1:37 am

    Incredibly sad news :(

  6. @CorettaJackson
    usa
    October 6, 2012, 9:56 am

    Disturbing news. Global warning is real.

  7. shawn
    ohio
    October 4, 2012, 11:28 am

    wow that was a lot of infro but that is retarded

  8. google
    October 4, 2012, 11:28 am

    poor barrier reef

  9. None
    October 4, 2012, 11:27 am

    omg

  10. shawn
    dayton
    October 4, 2012, 11:27 am

    It is a shocking event, but sadly these reports and pages would be more read by the likes of us, who already understand to some extent the effects of Global Warming.
    What is required by WRI and the UN is sustained media campaign on popular TV channels along with explanation of how such changes would directly affect the life we know. Both ecomocially and ecologically.
    But the most challanging task would be to balance the ecological good with business opportunity saving the planet would harbinger.
    Perhaps then the World has a fighting chance. Because the rate of growth of the truly environmentally aware is very small compared to the time window we have to abate climate change.

  11. camdhabadd
    dayton
    October 4, 2012, 11:26 am

    Wow

  12. Sandeep Goswami
    Mumbai
    October 4, 2012, 9:13 am

    It is a shocking event, but sadly these reports and pages would be more read by the likes of us, who already understand to some extent the effects of Global Warming.
    What is required by WRI and the UN is sustained media campaign on popular TV channels along with explanation of how such changes would directly affect the life we know. Both ecomocially and ecologically.
    But the most challanging task would be to balance the ecological good with business opportunity saving the planet would harbinger.
    Perhaps then the World has a fighting chance. Because the rate of growth of the truly environmentally aware is very small compared to the time window we have to abate climate change