By Jonathan Kolby
It all started as an idea one afternoon seven years ago. Having recently learned about the devastating amphibian chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, or Bd) that was spreading globally and causing irreparable damage to the world’s amphibian biodiversity, I felt there must be something more I could personally do to help save the amazing amphibians of Madagascar.
Expansive field surveys had been performed around the island nation, which indicated the absence of Bd, a remarkable and important phenomenon, as dozens of countries had already been invaded. The original catalyst and subsequent contemporary pathways of global Bd dispersal remain largely enigmatic, although the international trade in live amphibians for consumption, exotic pets, and research has been demonstrated to be a suitable vehicle of transcontinental spread in some instances.
Although amphibians are not commercially imported into Madagascar, I believed it was still only a matter of time before an outbreak of Bd would somehow occur, as was true for the island of Montserrat, where the iconic mountain chicken frog (Leptodactylus fallax) was nearly wiped to extinction following the unexpected arrival of Bd in 2009. Judging from this and other similar outbreaks, I was concerned that any chance to help protect Madagascar’s amphibians from the alarming scope of decline and extinctions observed in Central America and Australia would be largely dependent on the earliest detection and intervention possible.
And that’s when the idea emerged. Combining my varied expertise in amphibian field biology, wildlife disease dynamics, and international wildlife trade regulation, I saw an opportunity to complement traditional field surveillance activities with a rapid assessment project focusing on international wildlife trade disease surveillance, an avenue not previously considered as a tool to quickly develop information to help other countries identify Bd presence within their borders.
Annually, millions of live animals are shipped around the world, including frogs from Madagascar, which are destined for the pet trade in the U.S. Shipments often contain hundreds of animals of various species collected from the wild from around the country. I believed that surveillance for Bd within the international wildlife trade could greatly reduce the amount of time and scientific resources (both human and financial) necessary to perform field surveillance activities encompassing a comparable selection and volume of amphibians.
This is certainly not to say it should replace traditional field surveys, but that a targeted dual-tiered collaborative approach can offer significant long-term benefits by informing and guiding the most efficient investment of field resources if trade detection were to occur prior to field detection.
Detecting the Disease
Little did I think that many years later, this idea and concept would ignite, catalyze a rapid response effort, and have me rush to Madagascar to help drive this national effort. I sampled a single shipment of amphibians exported from Madagascar containing nearly 600 frogs and was astounded when results were recently obtained, confirming the presence of Bd in the skin swabs collected from three of these wild-collected amphibians.
With support from the National Geographic Society and the Columbus Zoo and Aquarium, I’ve been able to swiftly apply this urgent information and develop a rapid response program to evaluate the presence and distribution of Bd throughout the country. I’m currently in my final week of a two-month expedition here in Madagascar to help decipher the origin of my trade surveillance results and determine whether Bd is indeed already present in the wild amphibian populations.
Over the past 50 days, my surveys have spanned hundreds of kilometers, included dozens of species, and assessed a multitude of habitats, in order to create a rapid expansive snapshot of disease distribution in the country. Furthermore, I’m concurrently performing two methods of pathogen detection (swabbing and environmental water filtration) to assess pathogen presence with greater sensitivity and confidence than by traditional methods where only one technique is generally utilized at a location.
If detected, I will next investigate how this pathogen may have been introduced to Madagascar, and identify biosecurity opportunities to mitigate current and future disease dispersal events to reduce the potential impact on biodiversity.
The opportunity to help understand and mitigate the presence of amphibian disease while working to build local scientific capacity has been an astounding experience. Along this journey, I have been exposed to the country’s astounding natural beauty, fascinating culture, and warm welcoming people and for this I feel quite privileged. This fieldwork has been performed in collaboration with the Cellule d’Urgence Chytride Madagascar (Chytrid Emergency Cell), EcoHealth Alliance, and James Cook University.
I am grateful for the support of all who have assisted me in the field, including Falitiana Rabemananjara (Chytrid Emergency Cell), Devin Edmonds (Association Mitsinjo), Lance Woolaver and Rock William (Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust Madagascar), and several Malagasy graduate students: Serge Ndriantsoa, Zo Faniry, and Sylviane Rakotozafy. In particular, I am indebted to Sara Ramirez for her invaluable assistance in all facets of this investigation, from project conception to fieldwork.
I eagerly await the results from the nearly 500 frogs and dozens of amphibian habitats we’ve sampled to determine if and where Bd is present and characterize the level of disease-associated threat now experienced by Malagasy amphibians.
Every great conservation challenge is followed by an opportunity for learning and innovation, and for this I remain optimistic that a strong international collaborative effort can still protect Madagascar’s amazing amphibians from the devastating spread of Bd. A swift response is imperative to protect this wealth of biodiversity and the time to act is now!