Menu

How Hosting an Edit-A-Thon Made Me Trust Wikipedia

The academic community has been wary of Wikipedia since it first came on the scene. Teachers have spent a decade warning their students not trust the online encyclopedia, concerned that because anyone can edit it, it might not be reliable. I’ll admit I first approached Wikipedia with caution, using it for quick reference but steering clear when conducting any serious research. But on Monday, at the first ever ocean edit-a-thon – sponsored by the Waitt Institute, Smithsonian Ocean Portal, and Wikimedia Foundation – my distrust dissolved.

While I still think the site should serve primarily as a jumping-off point for research projects, Monday’s event in honor of World Oceans Day, brought together an excellent group of ocean scientists and enthusiastic editors who together improved the encyclopedia’s ocean-related information.

IMG_7935
Let the editing begin! Ocean-loving Wikipedia newbies learning the ropes.

Wikipedia wields tremendous influence in shaping public perception of the ocean science and conservation. That is good reason (as I wrote here previously) “Why Ocean Conservationists Should Care Pay More Attention to Wikipedia.”

The edit-a-thon kicked off with experts from Wikimedia DC explaining the details of how to edit, the requirement of verifiability, and the fierce monitoring of conflicts of interest. Once I had a deeper understanding of the process I gained a newfound respect for the level of vetting and quality control the community insists upon.

IMG_7939
Surrounded by ocean science books, computer cords, and snacks as we dig into editing.

And then we jumped in the deep end. I don’t consider myself a particularly tech-savvy person, and at first I found the Wikipedia backend a bit daunting. Thankfully the volunteers from Wikimedia DC provided one-on-one guidance that enabled us to avoid the pitfalls that sometimes result in an edit’s reversal.

Once we got a handle on process, we were all surprised by how excited we were to roll up our sleeves and began adding to and creating articles. At one point, I heard a squeal and looked up to see Dr. Nancy Knowlton, a Chair at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History, looking giddy with glee after she updated the ocean acidification article with the latest science. And I found myself throwing my hands up in victory after creating an article for ocean zoning.

20150608-Nancy at Edit-a-thon
Dr. Nancy Knowlton couldn’t contain her glee after making her first successful edits.

By the end of the day, we had made substantial progress in adding depth to Wikipedia’s ocean-related topics. We created new article pages for ocean zoning and environmental DNA. We expanded and improved articles relating to ocean acidification, aquaculture, and overfishing. We added links to all of the Waitt Institute’s factsheets and other sources in order to provide users with easy access to additional information.

It was so gratifying to think that the next people who search for these subjects would find our contributions and might find them useful; to think that some term papers might use the more up-to-date and diverse sources that we insert; to think that some questions people came to Wikipedia with would be better answered.

IMG_7953
Emily Frost, of the Smithsonian Ocean Portal, feeling accomplished after her first edits.

Observing and participating in this process made me trust Wikipedia much more as a resource. Should Wikipedia serve as your only destination when seeking out information on a particular topic? Nope. It’s important to click through to the original references, external links, and academic literature. But after seeing the devotion to accuracy that’s inherent in the Wikipedia community, I now admire and trust its offerings.

Wikipedia is a process, not a product. I signed up to receive email alerts when anyone edits the pages I contributed to, and in just the last few days other editors have already made significant additions, further enriching this resource. Wikipedia is ever-evolving and improving. And it’s up to each of us, the passionate, the experts, to contribute to that process. I, for one, look forward to continuing to contribute to building the wealth of knowledge contained in the world’s largest encyclopedia well into the future. I hope you’ll join me.

IMG_7950
Concentrating hard as I write my 1st Wikipedia article.

Happy #WorldOceansDay! For more about the work of the Waitt Institute, follow @WaittInstitute on FacebookTwitter, Instagram, YouTube, and Tumblr.

Comments

  1. Ahmad
    September 2, 2015, 11:37 am

    The pictures look like an Apple ad. I’ve never seen so many MacBooks and iPhones… used to edit wikitext. Overkill! LOL

  2. Gregory Kohs
    Pennsylvania
    June 15, 2015, 10:39 am

    Just wait a few weeks. Idiots will be along soon to undermine the good work that you did. You’ll grow distraught with the disappointment of Wikipedia, just as tens of thousands of other former frequent editors became.